The River

As anyone who cares likely knows, Google yesterday filed an Form S-1 document with the Securities and Exchange Commission, step 1 to offering its stock to the public. Now it seems, everyone’s an expert on Google, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s a bit troubling that the company wants the benefits of being a public company, but thinks it can do things its own way. The optimist in me really hopes that it can, but the cynic thinks it’s going to be brought down.

Who’d have thought the Google IPO craze would have hit the subways? Heading home last night, I stood lazily on the Q train platform at Union Square, iPod rolling. An older couple — say, late 50s or early 60s — walked up next to me and stood waiting. What first caught my eye was the guy’s hat. It was emblazoned with the Google logo. Then, I saw both he and the woman were wearing black Google fleece jackets. Hmm… my mind raced. Early investors trying to boost an IPO? Ridiculous, I know…. The whole IPO madness is certainly getting that way.

I already obsessively download workout data from my heart rate monitor. Now I’m looking for a new phone/pda/camera-like device, and this new release from Polar and Nokia — both Finnish companies — catches my eye. Hmm…

My husband is Scottish… (that’s my excuse). But don’t you agree that kilts are dead sexy?

Yahoo! this week is debuting an ad campaign portraying itself as a “Life Engine.” Now, the Onion is reporting the all-encompassing portal is launching a soul search engine.

“All those long, difficult nights of pondering your place in this world are a thing of the past,” the site quotes Yahoo! CEO Terry Semel as saying.

The New York Times City section has a great retrospective on the history of the New York subway system — a fitting subject, I’d think, for a blog titled Subway Diaries. Check out the multimedia presentation especially. Good stuff.

By now, techie folks will have heard of Google’s Gmail. It’s the “is it a joke, or isn’t it?” e-mail service announced by Google the other day.

There was a lot of confusion on the ‘Net about whether the announcement was a joke — news stories about it appeared on April Fool’s day, a press release on Google’s site was dated April 1 (though a BusinessWire version went out on March 31), and the tone of the release was anything but businesslike.

I was one of the reporters who wrote up the story — got to it after business hours so didn’t talk to Google until after the story had originally been published. Talking to Google reassured me it was for real, but it still didn’t please me.

“We meant to have fun and celebrate the day, not to confuse our friends in the world of journalism,” a Google exec told me. “I can assure you that the announcement of Gmail is no joke.”

Why, then, the jokey headline and press release? Why the reference to an “April 1, 2004 UTC” dateline, when the release on the wire said the 31st? I’m anything but humorless, but this just isn’t funny. Past jokes, such as those about PigeonRank and MentalPlex have been immediately recognized for what they are — jokes. Either it’s a joke, or it isn’t. Communicate.

As a journalist, I take my responsibility to impart truthful information very seriously. When someone tells me something as if it’s factual, and then winks and nods as if it’s not, their credibility — and therefore my credibility as a journalist — is at stake. And does it do any good for the institution of journalism for people to walk around all day and wonder whether venerable institutions like the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times have been duped? (I guess the Times has been duped, but that’s another story… ) Journalism has enough real problems as it is.

I was pretty hot about this yesterday, because it really got me thinking about truth and deception and journalism and corporate responsibility. I’m a little calmer now… and I’m no longer receiving e-mails from readers asking me “you know it’s a joke, don’t you?”

I’m adding a link so you can access an RSS feed of this blog.

This Windows media video is the best send-up I’ve seen in a long long time. Scott Richter, the spammer that appears in it, is one of those sued by Microsoft and the NY Attorney General.